Yamaha receiver radio tuner mac#

But Stereophile DID recommended it and it won ALL the RF competitions easily. It was given a lukewarm review from Stereophile, where their worst insults were only limited to its sound not being quite as good as the CD player feeding the transmitter. It seems to be underrated because of a snub from an American Tuner designer who said nothing about the tuner one way or another, but just refused to try to modify it. Criticisms regarding its complexity ring shallow to anybody who’s had to live with (any) Microsoft Operating System. These include fine tuning, digital numeric Signal Strength readouts, world beating sensitivity and fine selectivity. It sounds nearly indistinguishable (audio) from the F-91, but has user controls the 91 lacks. Stations broadcasting 64 Kbps or less sound worse than over-the-air FM,īroadcasts of 128 kbps or greater sound way better than over-the-air FM. With the Sonos I can even search for my favorite programs, such as Prairie HomeĬompanion, and it shows me when the next show will be playing. Systems deliver FM radio with better fidelity and convenience than over-the-air. Both the Sonos and the Logitech wireless music Too bad it sounded so “meh.”Įverything was there, but it was all so gray and ordinary. Terms of signal sensitivity and selectivity. I bought it for $50 and it was easily the best tuner I ever owned in And Dyna made enough tuners thatįM tuner. When properly adjusted, a Dyna FM-3 makesĪn excellent and inexpensive FM source. Intermittent physical transformer hum (to fix the hum you had to put a VPIīrick on it) it worked exceedingly well. That had a very early front panel that looked more like an FM-1. KHz, it had to be some serious attenuation for it to be so noticeable. When you consider that FM hasn’t got any appreciable signal output above 13

Yamaha receiver radio tuner mac#

That Mac look, but I always felt it was a dark and hooded sounding tuner, and Of its tuning wheel are enough to make almost most audiophiles with theĭisposable income reach for their wallet.

Lust after a Marantz 10B is probably wired wrong. Scott 310-E on all but the most hard to receive stations.īut I listened to quite a few over the years. I kept the tuner for yearsīecause it was so rare and such a good performer – it was the equal of the Their factory and outfitted with an Ampex faceplate. I’ve only seen one example of this model, which was the one I purchased from Stable and had that slight euphonic tube-given warmth that made even the rudest Scott Solid-state component than one from Scott’s golden age, but it was very

It isn’t the prettiest because it looks more like an early Most complex tuner), but I found the 310-E to be the best-performing Scott Scott’s finest tuner (it was certainly Scott’s I used it with the Signal Sleuth and FM-1 antenna, both of which I still own and use. Than any readily available commercial recording of the orchestra.

The Boston Symphony Orchestra on Friday afternoons, the Etude sounded better High-end tuner because it sounded so neutral. Magnum Dynalab Etude – This was my favorite It was worth too much to sit idle, so I sold it. It except I listened to over-the-air radio so rarely that it sat, unused for It always worked perfectly and wasĪmong the most sensitive and selective tuners I’ve ever owned. In my big room system for over five years. Its heft, I’ll probably keep this one forever… $150 on the used market, and would cost at least $40 to ship anywhere due to It a super late night all-in-one listening station. Also the TA-9100 includes a very good headphone amp, making Stations as well as a Fanfare, Magnum Dynalab, or Scott 310-E, its performance was not too far behind. Or repaired and it still works perfectly. These sitting on one of my equipment shelves. I thought I’d list, in no particular order, some of my favorite Several years with receivers, including a Harman Kardon Nocturne, I graduated Rock and roll, soon followed by college radio stations such as WFMU. Know that listening to Murray the K (the fifth Beatle) was my introduction to Point to the radio, FM radio, as their first electronic connection to music. Music a majority say something like, “I remember listening to the radio underĬovers (so my parents wouldn’t hear) after I was supposed to be asleep…” Most I ask folks of my generation about their earliest recollections of listening to Vintage stereo amplifiers.Twitter Facebook Email Print LinkedIn Pinterest SMS WhatsApp